Turley: Bragg’s Created ‘Frankenstein Case’ Against Trump Based on Dead Misdemeanors

George Washington University Law School professor Jonathan Turley described Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s prosecution of former President Donald Trump as a “Frankenstein case” based on resurrected alleged misdemeanor business record violations.

Bragg indicted Trump last spring on 34 counts of falsifying business records in the first degree, taking what are normally misdemeanor violations and making them felonies, because the DA alleges that Trump was seeking to hide an underlying crime.

The felony charges allowed Bragg to extend the statute of limitations from two years to six.

But Bragg has not been entirely clear what the underlying crime is; although he suggested when he announced the charges, it had to do with a reported $130,000 in payments made to porn star Stormy Daniel ahead of the 2016 presidential election.

Trump is said to have paid Daniels through his personal attorney Michael Cohen as part of a nondisclosure agreement regarding an alleged sexual encounter they had in 2006.

Trending:

Pro-Palestinian Agitators Attempting to Block Miami Road Find Out Things Are Different in Florida

On Fox News on Monday, host John Roberts asked Turley what would be criminal about Trump paying Daniels as part of a nondisclosure agreement, noting such contracts happen all the time.

“This is a Frankenstein case,” Turley responded. “They took a dead misdemeanor. They attached it to a dead alleged federal felony and zapped it back into life.”

“So many of us are just amazed to watch this actually walk into court because it’s not a recognizable crime that any of us have seen,” he added.

Should Bragg’s case be thrown out?

Turley explained that the payment to Daniels does not appear to be a federal crime.

At most, the business record violations would be state misdemeanors with a two-year statute of limitations, and Cohen was allegedly reimbursed in 2017, putting the records far outside the window of criminal liability.

“Then what Bragg said was, ‘Well, I’m going to allege that you did false filings on business records to hide a crime,’ but he was very ambiguous what that crime might be. He still is ambiguous, but it is assumed to be a federal election crime,” Turley said.

Related:

Barr Calls Bragg’s Case Against Trump an ‘Abomination,’ Says He Will Vote for Former President

The theory is that Cohen was making an in-kind contribution to the Trump campaign in excess of federal campaign limits.

“The problem is the federal government doesn’t view it as a crime. They decided not to prosecute, and most election experts say that this is the type of thing that’s failed in the past,” Turley noted.

The $130,000 didn’t go to, nor did the alleged reimbursement come from, Trump’s presidential campaign. Further Trump could have had other reasons he didn’t want Daniels’ allegation made public besides whatever impact it may have had on his candidacy.

Prior to Bragg’s indictment, federal prosecutors and the Federal Election Commission had already reviewed the payments to Daniels and declined to charge Trump.

Turley and other legal experts contend the way Trump may win the case is by a provision in New York law that allows the defendant’s attorneys to ask the judge to instruct the jury that they may convict their client on lesser offenses.

In Trump’s trial, it would be the misdemeanor crime of falsifying records.

Former federal prosecutor Andy McCarthy argued in a Monday piece for National Review, “If the jury were to acquit Trump of the greater felony offense but find him guilty of the misdemeanor, I believe any convictions would have to be thrown out because the statute of limitations on the misdemeanor has lapsed.”

Fellow former prosecutor Ankush Khardori also made an argument in Politico that Trump’s best move would be the misdemeanor jury instruction route.

Khardori quoted an unnamed source familiar with Trump’s legal strategy indicating that is certainly something his attorneys are weighing.

“‘Now, obviously he doesn’t want’ to be convicted at all, the person familiar with Trump’s legal strategy said, ‘but a misdemeanor conviction in state court in Manhattan is going to have absolutely no effect on this guy’s ability to run for office or on his liberty.’”


A Note from Our Deputy Managing Editor:

 

I heard a chilling comment the other day: “We don’t even know if an election will be held in 2024.” 

 

That wasn’t said by a conspiracy theorist or a doomsday prophet. No, former U.S. national security advisor Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn said that to the founder of The Western Journal, Floyd Brown.

 

Gen. Flynn’s warning means that the 2024 election is the most important election for every single living American. If we lose this one to the wealthy elites who hate us, hate God, and hate what America stands for, we can only assume that 248 years of American history and the values we hold dear to our hearts may soon vanish.

 

The end game is here, and as Benjamin Franklin said, “We must all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately.”

 

All of this means that without you, it’s over. We have the platform, the journalists, and the experience to fight back hard, but Big Tech is strangling us through advertising blacklists, shadow bans, and algorithms. Did you know that we’ve been blacklisted by 90% of advertisers? Without direct support from you, our readers, we can’t continue the fight.

 

Can we count on your support? It may not seem like much, but a Western Journal Membership can make all the difference in the world because when you support us directly, you cut Big Tech out of the picture. They lose control. 

 

A monthly Western Journal Membership costs less than one coffee and breakfast sandwich each month, and it gets you access to ALL of our content — news, commentary, and premium articles. You’ll experience a radically reduced number of ads, and most importantly you will be vitally supporting the fight for America’s soul in 2024.

 

We are literally counting on you because without our members, The Western Journal would cease to exist. Will you join us in the fight? 

 

Sincerely,

Josh Manning

Deputy Managing Editor

The Western Journal

Randy DeSoto has written more than 3,000 articles for The Western Journal since he joined the company in 2015. He is a graduate of West Point and Regent University School of Law. He is the author of the book “We Hold These Truths” and screenwriter of the political documentary “I Want Your Money.”

Birthplace

Harrisburg, Pennsylvania

Nationality

American

Honors/Awards

Graduated dean’s list from West Point

Education

United States Military Academy at West Point, Regent University School of Law

Books Written

We Hold These Truths

Professional Memberships

Virginia and Pennsylvania state bars

Location

Phoenix, Arizona

Languages Spoken

English

Topics of Expertise

Politics, Entertainment, Faith



Source link