Head of Pelosi’s Security Detail Allegedly ‘Perjured Himself on the Stand’ About Jan. 6: Report

The Blaze just dropped a massive bombshell that, if true, further threatens the foundation of the Democrats’ Jan. 6 narrative.

“Thanks to new House Speaker Mike Johnson, We now have permission to release Capitol CCTV footage proving that a member of Nancy Pelosi’s security detail, Special Agent David Lazarus, perjured himself on the stand during the Oath Keepers trial,” the outlet posted Monday on X.

The Oath Keepers were one of the groups present at the Capitol on Jan. 6. Many members were charged with and found guilty of serious felonies for their actions that day, including seditious conspiracy.

According to the Blaze, Lazarus, the head of Pelosi’s security detail, corroborated the testimony of Capitol Police officer Harry Dunn, who claimed he had an “antagonistic encounter with the Oath Keepers” during the incursion.

However, the video footage released by the Blaze does not appear to support that version of events.

Trending:

Video Emerges of Moments Before Man Ran Into Jet Engine at Airport – Something Clearly Wasn’t Right Here

The report from the Blaze goes into further detail, alleging that Dunn gave two FBI interviews that were “in conflict with one another” — in the first claiming the Oath Keepers protected him, and in the second claiming he had to fight them off while they hurled racial insults at him.

This is where Lazarus comes in to testify that he saw Dunn “being hassled by these Oath Keepers.”

But according to the Blaze, none of that is true. The footage shows the Oath Keepers calmly standing between Dunn and “more agitated protesters,” just as Dunn described in his first FBI interview.

Not only that, but Lazarus was not even in the building when the alleged altercation took place.

Instead, CCTV footage shows that he was in “another Senate office building across the street” and missed the encounter by several minutes, only reaching the area once the Oath Keepers had left.

None of that, the Blaze claims, stopped Lazarus from making up a corroborating story out of whole cloth. Thus, “Harry Dunn was made a hero by Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi, and as a result of his and David Lazarus’s false testimony, there are innocent people in prison.”

“The government lied about this,” the Blaze’s X post said. “What else are they lying about?”

Oof.

Related:

‘Sleeping Giant’ Supreme Court Case Could Cripple Jack Smith’s Prosecution of Trump: Law Professor

Is the government lying to us about what took place on Jan. 6, 2021?

Granted, it’s difficult to tell if any footage has been cherry-picked or withheld to bolster the Blaze’s claims. But if the outlet’s reporting is correct, then another one of the foundations of the Jan. 6 “insurrection” narrative has crumbled.

Not even taking this footage into account, there is too much about the establishment media’s Jan. 6 narrative that doesn’t add up.

Too many times the story has been distorted and stretched, like some sort of malevolent game of telephone, until we get to a hysterical account that treats the Capitol incursion as the equivalent of Pearl Harbor and 9/11.

If the Blaze’s report is true, the questions remain: Who set up Dunn and Lazarus to make up this story and lie on the stand? Why wasn’t the security footage released until plenty of people were already sentenced? People who, if the Blaze is to be believed, were thrown in jail based on perjured testimony.

Perjury is a serious crime — remember that Bill Clinton was impeached because he perjured himself, and that was over a comparatively much less serious matter. If it can be proved that Dunn and Lazarus perjured themselves, they could face up to five years of prison time.

Regardless, the fact that this footage is only now coming to light further demonstrates just how untrustworthy the federal government is.

As the Blaze asked, if they were hiding a lie as grotesque as this seems to be, what else are they hiding about Jan. 6?


A Note from Our Deputy Managing Editor:

 

I heard a chilling comment the other day: “We don’t even know if an election will be held in 2024.” 

 

That wasn’t said by a conspiracy theorist or a doomsday prophet. No, former U.S. national security advisor Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn said that to the founder of The Western Journal, Floyd Brown.

 

Gen. Flynn’s warning means that the 2024 election is the most important election for every single living American. If we lose this one to the wealthy elites who hate us, hate God, and hate what America stands for, we can only assume that 248 years of American history and the values we hold dear to our hearts may soon vanish.

 

The end game is here, and as Benjamin Franklin said, “We must all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately.”

 

All of this means that without you, it’s over. We have the platform, the journalists, and the experience to fight back hard, but Big Tech is strangling us through advertising blacklists, shadow bans, and algorithms. Did you know that we’ve been blacklisted by 90% of advertisers? Without direct support from you, our readers, we can’t continue the fight.

 

Can we count on your support? It may not seem like much, but a Western Journal Membership can make all the difference in the world because when you support us directly, you cut Big Tech out of the picture. They lose control. 

 

A monthly Western Journal Membership costs less than one coffee and breakfast sandwich each month, and it gets you access to ALL of our content — news, commentary, and premium articles. You’ll experience a radically reduced number of ads, and most importantly you will be vitally supporting the fight for America’s soul in 2024.

 

We are literally counting on you because without our members, The Western Journal would cease to exist. Will you join us in the fight? 

 

Sincerely,

Josh Manning

Deputy Managing Editor

The Western Journal



Source link